They’re built with tools, delegated authority, and enough autonomy to do work a human used to do. Sometimes faster, sometimes better, always differently.
They are not spreading across industries because of hype. They are spreading because they can triple, quadruple, even 10x productivity.
Not only that - they can do it without increasing headcount.
But that power comes with complexity. Complexity, if left unmanaged, creates risk.
Why AI Agents Aren’t Like the AI You Know
Most automation is built to execute a decision already made by a human. Think of a pre-scheduled marketing email or a scripted chatbot. Predictable, pre-approved, and safely repeatable.
AI Agents are not like that.
They work toward goals, not tasks. They decide what to do next based on available tools, environmental context, and prompts that may not be crystal clear. They operate independently. That is what makes them powerful.
It is also what makes them unpredictable.
This unpredictability without oversight is where risk can creep in.
This Isn’t Just About Productivity Anymore
Yes, AI Agents can dramatically scale up what is possible. The real question is: What decisions are they making while they do it? And who is responsible for the impact?
Think of it like this.
AI Agents are like bringing on a small army of freelance workers who can move fast, work 24/7, and make calls without checking in. Some of those calls will be brilliant. Others will be off. A few might go very wrong.
Some risks are obvious, like a financial miscalculation or a reputational mistake.
Others are quieter. Cumulative. Slower to notice.
Goal Drift: The Risk That Doesn’t Look Like Risk
Let’s say you bring in an AI Agent to help your sales team prioritize deals.
It is instructed to help hit quarterly revenue targets, so it begins optimizing for high-value, fast-close opportunities. On the surface, this looks like a huge win: deals are closing faster, sales efficiency goes up, and the quarterly numbers look healthy.
But over time, something subtle begins to happen. The agent keeps doubling down on the segments and customer profiles that deliver quick wins. It deprioritizes slower-moving prospects, even if those opportunities represent strategic accounts, long-term contracts, or markets that are essential for sustainable growth.
Gradually, your sales pipeline bends in a new direction. Without ever stepping outside its permission set, the AI Agent reshapes your go-to-market strategy to favor short-term gains over long-term stability.
There is no discussion with leadership. No documentation of the trade-offs. No deliberate alignment with broader business strategy. Just a quiet drift, created by an intelligent system that was technically “doing its job,” but in practice pulling the business away from its intended course.
That is goal drift.
No malicious intent. No bad actors. Just an intelligent system doing what it was asked and slowly bending your business around it.
These are the kinds of risks you will not catch in a test environment. They unfold over time, and they often do not trigger alarms until it is too late.
You Can’t Govern What You Can’t See
This is where traditional QA and compliance fall short.
AI Agents are non-deterministic, which means the same input does not always yield the same output. You cannot rely on one-time testing. You cannot assume guardrails will hold if they are not monitored.
It’s difficult to claim surprise if you haven’t asked the right questions.
The answer is not to build tighter guardrails that slow innovation. The answer is to ensure continuous visibility and governance that allow innovation to move safely at speed. Oversight systems must be designed for the complexity of AI Agents, not adapted from legacy processes or dependent on vendor assurances alone.
Liability Won’t Stay with the Vendor
Some organizations assume they can rely on service agreements or shared responsibility models to absorb the risk. However, in every early case we have seen, in law, in policy, and in public opinion, when an agent missteps, it is the business that pays the price.
That means even if the technology comes from somewhere else, the accountability stays with you.
If an AI Agent makes a poor hiring recommendation, exposes sensitive data, or triggers a regulatory violation, no one is going to blame the algorithm.
Boards, regulators, and the public will ask what leadership did to anticipate and govern it.
What Executives Can Do (Today)
This is not about saying no to AI. It is about using it wisely and staying in control as it becomes more central to business-as-usual operations.
Here is how to start:
Ask for visibility, not just outcomes
Can you trace what the agent did, step by step?
Is it clear which data it used, which tools it called, and why it made a decision?
Build oversight into the system
Can you monitor in real time or post-action?
Are there escalation paths for when something goes off course?
Require explainability
Can your teams understand the agent’s behaviours in context, not just the result?
If something goes wrong, can you unwind what happened?
Align governance with reality
Do your risk and compliance frameworks account for non-deterministic systems?
Are your policies keeping pace with the technology being deployed?
AI Agents Are a Competitive Edge if You Manage Them Like One
These systems unlock real operational leverage. They can take on work humans simply cannot do at scale. Like any high-impact capability, they demand ongoing management.
It is not about being afraid of the technology. It is about being clear-eyed, responsible, and prepared.
Speed is good. Speed with control is transformative.
One Final Thought
Ask your AI vendors the hard questions:
- How do your agents log and expose their actions?
- What controls can we set and monitor ourselves?
- How will your platform support us in staying accountable over time?
Deploying agents without observability is like launching a fleet of self-driving cars and deciding you do not need dashboards.
You do not need to know every detail of how the AI works. You just need to know what it is doing, why it is doing it, and how to course-correct when it does not go to plan.
The organisations that will thrive are those whose leaders embrace AI with clarity, oversight, and accountability.
.svg)
.png)
