Skip to main content

Beam: Remediation

Mitigation that happens before the damage

Beam guides agent decisions in real time, keeping activity aligned with enterprise policy without slowing your builders down. Start in monitor mode, enforce when you are confident.

  • Fitch Group
  • Synthesia
  • AlphaSense
  • The Telegraph
  • A+E Global Media
  • Forge Holidays
  • OakNorth
  • Matillion
  • Allica Bank

And dozens more

Risk detection is half the battle – autonomous intervention and guidance is the next step

A month of findings

Alerts raised
1,000
Reviewed by the team
30
Analyst time spent
half a day
Controls actually applied
unrecorded

Every finding arrives as work for a human who is already behind.

The same month, with Beam

Grouped into risk patterns
14
Policies activated
9
Interventions applied inline
412
Left for a human decision
3

Contextual risk remediation that escalates with risk

Geordie’s inline remediation engine, Beam, shapes agent behavior in real time through context engineering, deployed via agent-native and harness-native mechanisms including lifecycle hooks, plugins, and MCP. Responses are context-specific and escalate with risk.

Monitor

Recorded, and nothing else

Beam watches the action and writes it to the immutable record without touching it. The agent proceeds exactly as it would have, and the team gets the evidence it needs to decide whether anything stronger is warranted.

Guide

Context and a better path, before it acts

Beam writes additional context into the agent’s reasoning and offers an approved pathway. Nothing is blocked; an agent heading somewhere it is not authorized for is guided to an equivalent it is, and the work continues.

Confirm

Paused until its operator decides

A new mode for the Claude ecosystem. The agent stops and waits for an explicit decision to continue or not. Beam delivers the context behind the pause to the agent, so whichever way the operator decides, the agent carries that context into what it does next.

Enforce

The agent has no option

Lifecycle hooks are binding. Prohibited actions and tool use do not execute, and the attempt is written to the immutable record.

The same action, two different answers

Policy that adapts per agent, per department and per use case – not one blanket rule at a boundary.

Finance agent

Proceeds

read · customer_financials

Authorized to process financial data. Beam adds no friction and the work completes.

Marketing agent

Guided

read · customer_financials

Not authorized. The agent is guided to an approved source and the campaign task still finishes.

Control applied where the decision is made

Beam applies context engineering directly within the agent's reasoning process, deployed via lifecycle hooks, plugins, and MCP to shape behavior at the moment decisions are made. Controls that work this way run continuously – without the latency of external policy checks or the binary outcomes of gateway enforcement.

  • Attaches to the agent's own execution path through lifecycle hooks, plugins, and MCP
  • Reads configuration, context and memory rather than inferring intent from traffic
  • No proxy and no single point of failure to bottleneck at enterprise volumes

Where enforcement happens

Gateway model

Interception is enforcement. One point carries every agent.

Beam's agent-native model

Beam attaches to the agent's own execution path through lifecycle hooks, plugins, and MCP, reading config, context, and behavioral patterns directly rather than inspecting traffic from outside.

Beam doesn't choose between depth and speed

The deep analysis happens continuously, out of band. The inline response is fast because the context is already there.

Offline

out of band · no latency

Continuous analysis drawing on the full depth of an agent's history.

  • Behavioral baselining
  • Risk pattern identification
  • Policy refinement

Online

inline · real time

Detection and response applied in the moment, using the context the offline work already built.

  • Action written to the immutable record
  • Context and an approved pathway written into the agent's reasoning
  • Paused until its operator decides
  • Prohibited action stopped at the hook

The assurance loop

  1. Observe
  2. Understand
  3. Compare to intent
  4. Control
  5. Prove
  6. Improve

“We've been rolling out agentic AI across the business for a while now, and the governance question kept coming up: what's actually running, what can it do, and what happens if something goes wrong? Geordie is helping us solve these problems. It's given us real peace of mind, and they're improving their product every week. Geordie should be on every company's shortlist for agentic AI discovery and governance.”

Michael Cena
Michael Cena
Head of Cybersecurity @ A+E Global Media

Control what must always hold. Shape what can improve.

Context engineering applied inside the agent's reasoning process, deployed via lifecycle hooks, plugins, and MCP to shape behavior at the moment decisions are made.

  • 30 minutes, run by an engineer
  • Read-only access, revoked whenever you like
  • A findings summary you can forward internally

See how we handle your data in our Trust Center (opens in a new tab)

Where is your company located?
Employee Count

The questions we get asked

Still unsure? Ask us anything – we answer in a day.

Beam shapes behavior through the agent's own context and configuration rather than inserting a gateway into the execution path, so an authorized action proceeds and an unauthorized one is guided to an approved pathway or, where the risk calls for it, does not execute. A hedge fund customer told us downtime from failed controls could cost more than a security incident; a large US financial data company now runs Beam inline across tens to hundreds of thousands of agents each day without disruption.
Consistency at scale. When you apply governance across an entire organization, enforcement has to behave the same way every time, and LLM-generated policies can change because the policy engine itself is non-deterministic – a policy that worked yesterday might not behave identically today. AI is used for analysis, behavioral understanding and anomaly detection instead.
No – Beam works collaboratively with them. Managed configurations and gateways cover one vendor or one tool type at a time, while agents adopt tools in ways that go beyond MCP. Beam adds the cross-platform, cross-tool-type controls that no single platform provides on its own, across skills, extensions, plugins, packages and SaaS connectors.
No. Beam runs sidecar with the agent's own infrastructure, and deployment requires no agent rebuilds and no reconfiguration of existing infrastructure – agents keep the configuration they already have. It's designed to integrate rather than displace, including alongside platform-native settings like managed configurations and Copilot policies.
Yes – that's what the control spectrum exists for. Responses are context-specific and escalate with risk. Monitor records an action without touching it, and Guide writes additional context into the agent’s reasoning and offers an approved pathway, so nothing is blocked. Confirm pauses the agent until its operator decides, and at Enforce lifecycle hooks are binding and the agent has no option.
The immutable audit log can feed downstream into your SIEM, and risk intelligence integrates with the security workflows you already run. Because the record is tamper-proof even where the native agent platform allows session replays or log deletion, a control action stands up as evidence in compliance reporting and incident response.
Beam is Geordie's inline remediation engine and sits inside the platform rather than deploying separately. It's the context engine that turns agent understanding into deterministic action, which is also why it's hard to copy: inline remediation depends on already having deep agent understanding before acting. Gartner described Beam as "unique in the market."